another Einstein Article

May 31st, 2005 by Benjamin Wagaman.
Categorized as personal.

Another Einstein? by Joseph Verrengia of The Associated Press
Will there ever be another Einstein?

This is the undercurrent of conversation at Einstein memorial meetings throughout the year.

A new Einstein will emerge, scientists say. But it may take a long time. After all, more than 200 years separated Einstein from his nearest rival, Isaac Newton.

Many physicists say the next Einstein hasn’t been born yet, or is a baby now. That’s because the quest for a unified theory that would account for all the forces of nature has pushed current mathematics to its limits. New math must be created before the problem can be solved.

But researchers say there are many other factors working against another Einstein emerging anytime soon.

For one thing, physics is a much different field today. In Einstein’s day, there were a few thousand physicists worldwide, and the theoreticians who could intellectually spar with Einstein probably would fit into a streetcar with seats to spare.

Education is different, too. One crucial aspect of Einstein’s training that is overlooked, says Notre Dame science historian Don Howard, is the years of philosophy he read as a teenager — Kant, Schopenhauer and Spinoza, among others. It taught him to how to think independently and abstractly about space and time, Howard says, and it wasn’t long before he became a philosopher himself.

“The independence created by philosophical insight is — in my opinion — the mark of distinction between a mere artisan or specialist and a real seeker after truth,” Einstein wrote in 1944.

And he was an accomplished musician. The interplay between music and math is well-known. Einstein would furiously play his violin as a way to think through a knotty physics problem.

Today, universities have produced millions of physicists. There aren’t many jobs in science for them, so they go to Wall Street and Silicon Valley to apply their analytical skills to more practical — and rewarding — efforts.

Those who stay in science don’t work alone. At labs like CERN, the world’s largest particle physics center in Switzerland, 100 researchers collaborate on a single atom-smashing experiment. Publishing the results takes years.

It’s hard to imagine a renegade like Einstein tolerating it.

“Maybe there is an Einstein out there today,” said Columbia University physicist Brian Greene, “but it would be a lot harder for him to be heard.”

Especially considering what Einstein was proposing.

“The actual fabric of space and time curving? My God, what an idea!” Greene said at a recent gathering at the Aspen Institute. “It takes a certain type of person who will bang his head against the wall because you believe you’ll find the solution.”

Perhaps the best examples are the five scientific papers Einstein wrote in his “miracle year” of 1905. These “thought experiments” were pages of calculations signed and submitted to the prestigious journal Annalen der Physik by a virtual unknown. There were no footnotes or citations.

What might happen to such a submission today?

“We all get papers like those in the mail,” Green said, “We put them in the crank file.”

an Einstein Article

May 30th, 2005 by Benjamin Wagaman.
Categorized as personal.

I found this article in the Centre Daily Times on April 17, 2005. I am extremely interested on Einstein’s persona and wanted to share my findings with you.

Universe of Knowledge by Joseph Verrengia of The Associated Press

A Century Later, Einstein’s Legacy, Like the Universe, Keeps on Expanding, making the scientist famous for his Universe of Knowledge.

He stopped traffic on Fifth Avenue like the Beatles or Marilyn Monroe. He could’ve been president of Israel or played violin at Carnegie Hall, but he was too busy thinking. His musings on God, love and the meaning of life grace our greeting cards and day-timers. Fifty years after his death, his shock of white hair and droopy mustache still symbolize genius.
Who else could it be but Albert Einstein?

Einstein remains the foremost scientist of the modern era. Looking back 2,400 years, only Newton, Galileo and Aristotle were his equals.

Around the world, universities and academies are celebrating the 100th anniversary of Einstein’s “miracle year” when he published five scientific papers in 1905 that fundamentally changed our grasp of space, time, light and matter. Only he could top himself about a decade later with his theory of general relativity.

Born in the era of horse-drawn carriages, his ideas launched a dazzling technological revolution that has generated more change in a century than in the previous two millennia.

Computers, satellites, telecommunication, lasers, television and nuclear power all owe their invention to ways in which Einstein peeled back the veneer of the observable world to expose a stranger and more complicated reality underneath.

And, he launched an intellectual quest for a single coherent law that governs the universe. Einstein said such a unified super-theory of everything, still unwritten, would enable us to “read the mind of God.”

“We are a different race of people than we were a century ago,” says astrophysicist Michael Shara of the American Museum of Natural History, “utterly and completely different, because of Einstein.”

Yet there is more, and it is why Einstein transcends mere genius and has become our culture’s grandfatherly icon.

He escaped Hitler’s Germany and devoted the rest of his life to humanitarian and pacifist causes with an authority unmatched by any scientist today, or even most politicians and religious leaders.

He used his celebrity to speak out against fascism, racial prejudice and the McCarthy hearings. His FBI file ran 1,400 pages.

His letters reveal a tumultuous personal life - married twice and indifferent toward his children while obsessed with physics. Yet he charmed lovers and admirers with poetry and sailboat outings. Friends and neighbors fiercely protected his privacy.

And, yes, he was eccentric. With hair like that, how could he not be?

He famously stuck his tongue out at photographers - that is, when he wasn’t wearing a Native American war bonnet or some other get-up. Cartoonists loved him.

He never learned to drive. He would walk home from his office at Princeton University, sockless and submerged in the pursuit of the “eternal riddle,” letting his umbrella rattle against the bars of an iron fence. If his umbrella skipped a bar, he would go back to the beginning of the fence and start over.

In those solitary moments, he unconsciously demonstrated the traits - intense concentration, disregard for fashion and innate playfulness - that would rescue him when, inevitably, he would be interrupted by both presidents and passers-by to explain the universe.

“Once you can accept the universe as matter expanding into nothing that is something,” Einstein once said, “wearing stripes with plaid comes easy.”

Today, there are curiously few statues of the man. The most notable is a 12-foot bronze at the National Academy of Sciences in Washington depicting the wrinkled old sage gazing at his famous E mc2 formula. Tourists climb into his lap for snapshots.

Rolf Sinclair despises it. “It’s one of the worst pieces of public sculpture,” says the retired National Science Foundation physics program officer. “It makes him look like one of the Three Stooges reading his horoscope.”

The Einstein that Sinclair and others would prefer immortalized is circa 1905, when he was 26 and about to rock the world.

By day, he worked in the Swiss patent office in Bern. He called it his “cobbler’s job,” but for seven years he analyzed a stream of inventions dealing with railroad timekeeping and other matters of precision that raised cosmic possibilities in his fertile mind.

After hours, he would work furiously on his “thought experiments,” that smashed through the limits of established physics.

“Imagination is more important than knowledge,” Einstein said. “The important thing is to not stop questioning.”

In 1905, he published five landmark papers without footnotes or citations. It marked the beginning of an unrivaled, two-decade intellectual burst.

Here is a brief chronology of his miracle year:

March, 1905: Conventional physics described light as a wave and could not explain how light can knock electrons off metal. Einstein showed that light is made of tiny packets of energy, or quanta, that can behave like individual particles, too.

This duality is the basis of quantum theory, a pillar of modern physics so paradoxical that even Einstein didn’t entirely buy into it. His explanation of this “photoelectric effect” won him the Nobel prize in 1921.

April: Based on cafe conversations over tea, Einstein submits a paper that determined the size of sugar molecules by calculating their diffusion in the liquid.

May: He shows how particles (like pollen) that appear to be independently moving in water are being jostled by atoms in water that are moving chaotically. Known as Brownian motion, Einstein’s calculations confirmed the atom’s existence and by extension, the makeup of chemical elements.

June: Einstein’s paper on “special relativity” separates him from the mainstream physics crowd. Newton considered gravity to be absolute - mass attracts mass. It’s what makes gas and dust form stars and debris form planets.

But Einstein sought to explain anomalies in this rule. Scientists had concluded that light was just one of many kinds of electromagnetic waves moving through an unseen medium they called ether, and the speed of light is always the same.

Einstein recalled a teenage daydream of racing a light beam. According to the physics of his day, if he moved as fast as the light, then the beam would be stationary in space.

Einstein said the speed of light is constant at 186,282 miles per second. But it will appear different depending on where you are and how fast you are traveling.

For example, clocks on orbiting satellites run a bit slower because the satellites are orbiting at 17,000 mph. They have programs that help them align with clocks on Earth.

Or, suppose you were to “witness” a star exploding into a supernova. The explosion occurred thousands of years ago, but it has taken that long for the light to reach you here.

November: Einstein publishes an extension of special relativity regarding the conversion of mass into energy, noting that the “mass of a body is a measure of its energy content.” In 1907, he abbreviated it to what would become science’s most famous equation: The amount of energy equals mass times the speed of light squared, or E mc2.

C2 is such a huge number that even small amounts of mass pack big power.

This became the theoretical basis for both atomic explosions and atomic energy.

“Each of these papers is a landmark in physics,” said University of Maryland physicist S. James Gates. “And yet all of his work in 1905 is a prelude to his greatest composition - the theory of general relativity.”

Special relativity was incomplete because it did not deal with gravity. To Newton, gravity was a constant, absolute force. Drop an apple and it hits the ground. A planet traces a curved orbit because the sun’s gravity tugs at the planet.

In Einstein’s relative world, matter warps the time and space around it. So, the sun’s mass dents and distorts the space-time fabric, curving the planet’s trajectory.

He reasoned that even particles of light, which have very tiny mass, should be affected in this way.

In 1919, astronomers watching a solar eclipse observed the light from a distant star being deflected by the darkening sun’s mass - by a few hundredths of a millimeter.

General relativity laid the foundation for all kinds of discoveries, such as the Big Bang, the expansion of the universe and black holes.

Yet relativity is both so profound and confounding that even other physicists have trouble grasping its nuances.

Einstein described relativity this way: “Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute, and it seems like an hour. Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems like a minute. That’s relativity.”

In a lifetime that coincided with Rudolph Valentino and Clark Gable, it’s hard to imagine Einstein as a lady’s man. With that hair? And those rumpled clothes?

He had a passionate personality that drew admirers. But physics always was his first love and that was the trouble.

The young Einstein’s indifferent, even ruthless, nature is evident in his dealings with his first wife, Mileva Maric. She and Einstein were students at the renowned Swiss National Polytechnic in Zurich.

In effusive letters and poetry, he called her Dollie and himself Johnny.

She gave birth to an out-of-wedlock daughter at her parents’ home in Hungary. The baby either died or was adopted. Einstein never saw the child.

The episode ended Mileva’s career before it began. She appears to have been a sounding board for his ideas, but historians doubt she was a true collaborator. They married in 1902 and Mileva bore two sons, but their passion soured as Einstein’s reputation grew. He complained that he had no time for marital “chatter.”

He and Mileva separated in 1914.

“You make sure … that I receive my three meals regularly in my room,” he wrote in his cold list of conditions. “You are neither to expect intimacy nor to reproach me in any way.”

But eight years later, he gave her the $32,000 purse from his Nobel Prize for physics.

Einstein had an affair with his German cousin, Elsa Lowenthal, and she nursed him back to health when he collapsed from nervous exhaustion in 1917. They married two years later, but she soon found herself tolerating his girlfriends. They emigrated to Princeton, where she died in 1936.

Until his own death from heart disease on April 18, 1955, relatives and his secretary kept house for Einstein at 112 Mercer Street. He also developed attachments to several women who shared his love of music, sailing and world affairs.

One was an alleged Soviet spy, Margarita Konenkova, a Russian DemigrDe married to a Greenwich Village sculptor.

Another was Johanna Fantova. She and her husband had met the scientist in Prague’s intellectual circles that included the novelist Franz Kafka. She emigrated to Princeton alone in 1939. She cut Einstein’s hair and he telephoned several times a week. In her diary, she included this charming line of verse from the physicist:

“Exhausted from a silence long/ This is to show you clear how strong/ The thoughts of you will always sit/ Up in my brain’s little attic.”

As an old man, he revealed to Fantova a melancholy side.

“The physicists say that I am a mathematician, and the mathematicians say that I am a physicist,” he said. “I am a completely isolated man and though everybody knows me, there are very few people who really know me.”

AP-ES-04-16-05 1222EDT

God does not ride a Unicycle!

May 24th, 2005 by Benjamin Wagaman.
Categorized as spiritual formation.

A picture is worth a thousand words:

bicycle

Innovation and Administration

May 21st, 2005 by Benjamin Wagaman.
Categorized as life.

It’s official. After two months of waiting we finally found out our job placements for this next year at World Headquarters in Orlando. I don’t think we could have gotten better placements.

Kelly - Administrative Assistant

Office of the President

She will assist someone in the Office of the President. With Kelly’s organizational skills and the ability to get things done, I think she’ll really thrive there. The President’s Office oversees the global effort of the 70 different ministries that make up Campus Crusade for Christ International in the United States and Internationally.

Ben - Web Developer

Innovation Center for Technology

Innovation Center for TechnologyI was almost in shock when I found out yesterday that I’ll be working in the ICT. I love creativity and innovation, especially with technology. This was my major at Penn State (Computer Science) and web development is presently my main field of creative expression. Plus, the ICT looks like it is the coolest work environment at Lake Hart. It feels like a giant design studio. More details to come soon…

ICT Studio

Foster on Spiritual Formation

May 20th, 2005 by Benjamin Wagaman.
Categorized as spiritual formation.

Dear Friends,

By now enough water has gone under the Christian Spiritual Formation bridge that we can give some assessment of where we have come and what yet needs to be done. When I first began writing in the field in the late 70s and early 80s the term “Spiritual Formation” was hardly known, except for highly specialized references in relation to the Catholic orders. Today it is a rare person who has not heard the term. Seminary courses in Spiritual Formation proliferate like baby rabbits. Huge numbers are seeking to become certified as Spiritual Directors to answer the cry of multiplied thousands for spiritual direction. And more.

Still, any genuine understanding of Spiritual Formation and its immense importance for the lives of individuals and churches is as remote as ever. Many contemporary books on the subject (and their number is now legion) simply take up the all too familiar recipe of consumer-Christianity-without-discipleship. Seminary programs become quickly polluted by issues that are a far cry from the spiritual growth of students: money (D. Min. programs give seminaries ready cash), pride (degrees abounding), arrogance (our program is better than your program), ATS accreditation concerns (reading lists and contact hours take precedence over soul growth in grace), and a host of other issues that have nothing to do with the life of “righteousness and peace and joy” in the Holy Spirit, and, indeed, are more often than not counterproductive to it. But, all this may be just as well, since Christian Spiritual Formation is really hammered out in the harsh realities of ordinary life—ear infections and broken arms and bosses filled with guile and stock market slumps and neighbors who deceive. Hence, these are the very places where our hardest study and most careful work in Spiritual Formation must go on.

A MOMENT OF GREAT OPPORTUNITY

You can probably detect that I am not overwhelmingly encouraged by the popular expressions of Spiritual Formation today. I’m not; too much is too faddish and too formulaic for me to be optimistic. And yet, we stand at a moment of great opportunity. Human need today is so obvious and so great that no honest person can deny it. People stagger under the burden of human wickedness. Evil is an open, oozing sore. Therefore superficial, half-answers will not do. Not anymore. Today, there is a great new fact in the contemporary interest in Spiritual Formation. And I view it as a source for enormous hope. This great new fact is the widespread belief that we can no longer bypass authentic, pervasive, thorough transformation of the inner life of the human being.

Add to this the fact that the many “spiritualities” that have arisen in our day do not answer the question of how we can become a good person. Nor do they possess the power to make a person good. But genuine Christian Spiritual Formation does answer the question and does possess the power to bring it to pass. And it is an answer and a power that shines brightly throughout the pages of history. It is no accident that the blazing light and life of Christian faithfulness overcame and supplanted all the “spiritualities” of Rome in the early centuries of the Christian Era. They offered a life—a formed, conformed, transformed life—that the Roman spiritualities simply could not match.

The same can happen today. If . . . if we will: 1) understand the absolute necessity of Spiritual Formation (no more optional discipleship), 2) make a firm intention to pursue it at all costs, 3) learn something of its means, and 4) faithfully practice it in daily life. As we move forward in Spiritual Formation, allow me to suggest several essential areas of focus.

FOCUSING ON JESUS

Nothing is more important in Christian Spiritual Formation than our need to continue ever focused upon Jesus. This is not formation-in-general. This is formation into Christlikeness. Everything hangs on this. Everything. Jesus gives skeleton and sinews and muscle to our formation. In Jesus we find definition and shape and form for our formation. Jesus is our Savior to redeem us, our Bishop to shepherd us, our Teacher to instruct us, our Lord to rule us, our Friend to come alongside us. He is alive. He teaches, rules, guides, instructs, rebukes, comforts. Stay close to him in all things and in all ways.

Then too, as Dallas Willard has taught us, we are constantly learning to live our life as Jesus would live our life if he were we. The point here is that we are not trying to live his life but our life. In the flesh Jesus’ life has already been lived. It is our life that needs the living. Remember, Jesus really is Lord; he is the Master of life, all life. He can teach you and me how to live our life. Really. You’re a computer programmer—he can teach you how to do that well. Ask him. Then listen . . . listen over a period of time. You’ll learn how to do it as he would do it if he were you. A teacher. Well, he is the Master teacher. How about brick laying? Yes, that too.

Some of the deepest teaching comes in the relationships we must deal with day in and day out. How do we relate to someone who deceives constantly? Jesus knows. Ask and it will be given to you. How about ego-driven colleagues? He understands them too. Jesus is the Master of all human relationships. He will guide you in what to say and what to do and how to respond.

Now, the canonical gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are the touchstone of our understanding of Jesus. These four Gospels in our Bible give us everything needful and essential about Jesus. They refuse, however, to indulge our curiosity about a whole host of details. How long was Jesus’ hair? What color were his eyes? What toys did he play with as a child? Did he play as a child? And more.

Beginning in the second century and continuing right up to the present, various writers have rushed to fill in the gaps with imaginative “lives of Jesus”. Even today every now and then some publisher will come out with a new book on “the lost life of Jesus”. Please, don’t be taken in by such consumer ploys. These flights of fantasy (if I may call them that) do not lead us to the Jesus who is the Way and the Truth and the Life; the Jesus who reveals to us the heart of the Father. No, these fictions reveal not Jesus but the agenda and the biases of the writer. They are a waste of good time and energy. Worse, they so titillate our fantasies that they distract the imagination from its proper function, which is, as Mary, to prayerfully ponder all the realities of Jesus in our heart (Luke 2:19). This prayerful pondering, this sanctified imagination, continually confronts us with the realities of ethical decision and moral choice. Always it drives us to turn from our way into God’s way. Always it brings us face-to-face with the reality of Jesus and calls us increasingly to take on his character, his thoughts, his habits, his passion, his compassion.

FOCUSING ON SCRIPTURE

My mention of the Gospel record leads me to a second essential area of focus for Spiritual Formation: Scripture. Oh, I hope you can feel deep down in your bones the great goodness and wonder of the Bible. God, in sovereign grace and outrageous love, has given us a written revelation of his own being and nature and of his purposes for humanity. That written revelation now resides as a massive fact at the heart of human history. There is, simply, no book that is remotely close to achieving the presence and influence of the Bible. It is truly The Book (hay Biblos).

But the intrinsic power and greatness of the Bible does not make it easy for us to receive the life it offers. In fact, we can often use the Bible in ways that stifle the spiritual life and even destroy the soul. This happened to any number of people who walked in the literal presence of Jesus, and it still happens today. Even to those who speak most highly of the Bible.

Sometimes we study the Bible for information alone in order to prove that we are right and others are wrong in particular doctrines or beliefs or practices. At other times we study the Bible to find some formula to solve the pressing need of the moment. But both approaches to the Bible leave the soul untouched. No, we need to study the Bible with a view to the transformation of our whole person and of our whole life into Christlikeness. We come to the Bible to receive the life “with God” that is portrayed in the Bible. To do this we must not control what comes out of the Bible. We must be prepared to have our dearest and most fundamental assumptions about ourselves and our associations called into question. We must read humbly and in a constant attitude of repentance. Only in this way can we gain a thorough and practical grasp of the spiritual riches that God has made available to all humanity in his written Word.

We can begin with the Gospels looking at the “with-God” life that is fully portrayed in Jesus. And we seek this life abundant that comes in and through Jesus alone. We study the Epistles to see the life of God being poured through his people, the Church. And we seek that life for ourselves and for our families and for our churches and for our times. We study the Psalms and see the people of God at prayer. And we too enter a living experience of prayer, working in co-operation with God to see his kingdom come and his will be done here on earth. We study the Pentateuch to understand the Mosaic Law in the light of grace. And we seek to conform our lives to the heart and spirit of the Law. We study the Historical books to understand how God works through the historical particularities of a people. And we ask for God’s life and God’s work in the specifics of our histories. We study the Prophets and see their bias in favor of the downtrodden. And we seek the power to live continually with a sensitized social conscience. We study the Wisdom books and discover God’s interest in the practical details of everyday life. And we pray for wisdom in the minutiae of our little life. We study the Eschatological books and discover that “He’s got the whole world in his hands”. And we place our little destiny in God’s hands too. And more.

Throughout our study of the Bible we are learning greater love: greater appropriation of God’s love for us, and for us to have greater love for God, for others, and for ourselves. All our study of the Bible is so that we might love more and know more of love. Not as an abstraction but as a practical reality by which we are possessed. And since all who love through and through “naturally” (supernaturally, too) obey the Law, we will be ever more obedient to Jesus Christ and his Abba Father. We surrender freely to the life we find in the Bible, trusting the living water that flows from Jesus through the Bible, and living in the reality of its abundance.

FOCUSING ON SPIRITUAL DISCIPLINES

The life we find in the Bible is meant for us. Jesus’ declaration, “I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly” is intended for you and for me (John 10:10). It is a life of unhurried peace and power. It is solid. It is simple. It is serene. It is radiant. But, it is not automatic.

There is a process, a God-ordained means, to becoming the kind of persons and the kind of communities that can fully and joyfully enter into such abundant living. This is the reason for the Disciplines of the spiritual life. They constitute the way God has given us for intentionally “training ourselves in godliness” (1 Tim. 4:7). This is why the Spiritual Disciplines is the third essential focus of Spiritual Formation.

Frankly, no Spiritual Disciplines, no Spiritual Formation. The Disciplines are the God-ordained means by which each of us is enabled to bring the little, individualized power pack we all possess—we call it the human body—and place it before God as “a living sacrifice” (Rom. 12:1). It is the way we go about training in the spiritual life. By means of this process we become, through time and experience, the kind of person who lives naturally and freely in “love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control” (Gal. 5:22-23).

What are these Spiritual Disciplines I am speaking of? Oh, they are many and varied: fasting and prayer, study and service, submission and solitude, confession and worship, meditation and silence, simplicity, frugality, secrecy, sacrifice, celebration, and the like. The commonly identified public religious activities are important to be sure, but the less commonly practiced activities like solitude and silence and meditation and fasting and submission to the will of others as appropriate are in fact more foundational for Spiritual Formation. All Disciplines should be thoughtfully and resolutely approached for the purpose of forming the life into Christlikeness, or they will have little or no effect in promoting this life.

It is vitally important for us to see all this spiritual training in the context of the work and action of God’s grace. As the great Apostle reminds us, “it is God who is at work in you, enabling you both to will and to work for his good pleasure” (Phil. 2:13). You see, we are not just saved by grace, we live by grace. And we pray by grace and fast by grace and study by grace and serve by grace and worship by grace. All the Disciplines are penetrated throughout by the enabling grace of God.

The training of the Spiritual Disciplines must always be seen in the context of an intimate, personal walk with Jesus himself. We are not looking for some exhaustive list of the Disciplines so that we can cross every “t” and dot every “i”. Nor are we looking for any “formula for blessedness”. No, no, this is a dynamic, interactive life “with God”. In practicing the Spiritual Disciplines we are simply learning to fall in love with Jesus over and over and over again.

BACK TO THE BEGINNING

And that takes us back to where we started, doesn’t it! We start with Jesus and we end with Jesus. As the Cotton Patch paraphrase of the Gospels puts it, “Jesus is tops over all!” Jesus is indeed our everliving Savior, Teacher, Lord, and Friend. He will guide and direct. All we need do is listen. And obey.

Peace and joy,
[752-1:none]
Richard J. Foster

This article first appeared in Heart-to-Heart, a publication of RENOVARÉ.

Brian McLaren

May 18th, 2005 by Benjamin Wagaman.
Categorized as culture, emerging church.

I found these videos at Off The Map. I have found them challenging and encouraging.

A New Kind of Christian

Brian McLaren explains the paradigm shift that we are going through as we transition from the modern to the post-modern eras. He shares his perspective on what this looks like and implications for the church. His revolutionary book, A New Kind of Christian: A Tale of Two Friends on a Spiritual Journey is a must read for pastors and leaders who are attempting to understand this paradigm shift.

Missional Series

Brian McLaren shares his thoughts at a live Off The Map event on new approaches and paradigms about being a missional Christian.

More McLaren [mp3s]

The Emerging Church

May 14th, 2005 by Benjamin Wagaman.
Categorized as culture, emerging church.

This is an interesting encyclopedia article on the Emerging Church

Brian McLaren is one of the leaders of the church in the emerging post-modern world.

Enemy of the Heart

May 12th, 2005 by Benjamin Wagaman.
Categorized as culture, spiritual formation.

“The more you do, the better you are,” has been the attitude of my heart over the last 27 years. I think I learned it from the work ethic of my family and I think they learned it from our culture. I don’t know the origin, because I am not a historian, but as I look back over the last hundred years of our country it makes sense. World War I, the depression, World War II, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, the War on Terrorism today. Difficult times brings great sacrifice. Suffering brings endurance. Endurance brings habit. A century of war has brought our country to eliminate the non-essentials so that we can focus on what is important. This has been good and bad together. The problem isn’t that the non-essentials were eliminated. The problem is that the essentials were eliminated.

This brings up the question of what is essential and what is not. This is a great question to ponder and there are two ways to look at it. First, “What will keep you from dying?” (the scarcity mindset). Second, “What will make you thrive?” (the abundance mindset). Let’s answer the first question, because this is the question that we’ve been asking as a culture.

Question one:

to keep a human being from dying there are the obvious: food, water, shelter (necessary resources to keep the physical body alive). But I wouldn’t stop there. Within a society, there must be justice, peace, righteousness (the pieces that protect and provide for people).

Question two:

in order to thrive there needs to be a deep sense of purpose, a connection/intimacy with God and significant others (family, spouse, friends), ability to think/feel the way you do safely and express it in peaceful ways. Beyond that, each person should understand how his Maker made him uniquely and seek to live to reflect the Maker’s Mark in him.

When you answer question one with question two things or vice versa you have a hell of a life. Disorder, discontentment, disillusionment. If you ask the average American Joe what the american dream is, he will tell you it is to make a lot of money, so that he can do what he wants to. But to say, “I want to have money so that I can thrive,” is a fallacy at the core. The pursuit of resources will remove scarcity but will never produce an inner abundance, because scarcity deals with the external, while abundance deals with the internal and relational. And those who passionately pursue wealth are really trying to fill the vacuum in their heart.

So, what is the problem with busyness? Busyness at the core comes from a desire to have an ordered physical life. A successful business will produce financial resources which solve the living conditions problem. But a pursuit of the physical body in exclusion to the pursuit of the soul leaves us dead inside. Having good physical conditions doesn’t make you thrive. In fact having too much stuff and focusing on the material world actually does the opposite. It kills us inside, because it encourages us to deprive our souls of what truly does bring life.

I’m not suggesting that we shouldn’t enjoy the physical life, because we are physical. To say the only thing that matters is the spiritual world is a mistake, because our whole experience of life is through a physical body. We should enjoy playing football and canoeing and festivities and dancing and laughter. However,

if this is our whole life, we will feel empty. Think about the celebrities in this world. They seem to have it all, but are missing the most important part. Wealth does bring freedom of choice, but does not bring inner happiness. The physical and the spiritual must be married if we want to truly live. We need to slow down our lives so that the still, quiet voice of God can seep into our lives. He speaks purpose into our life. He is eternal and immortal. He is not frantic in his actions, worried about what will happen. And he loves you, not what you can do for him. He doesn’t need you to provide for Him. He can do everything he needs to himself anyway. He simply wants your heart, because he wants give you life.

“Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or drink; or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more important than food, and the body more important the clothes? Look at the birds of the air; they do not sow or reap or store away in barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not much more valuable then they? Who of you by worrying [about these things] can add a single hour to his life?” - Jesus

Next Page »